Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
ausip:copyrightdefences [2019/09/11 15:05]
nic
ausip:copyrightdefences [2019/09/11 15:05] (current)
nic
Line 279: Line 279:
  
 * Second Circuit found fair use: the studio’s use was a transformative parody because it imitated the original for comic effect or ridicule. * Second Circuit found fair use: the studio’s use was a transformative parody because it imitated the original for comic effect or ridicule.
 +
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
  
Line 296: Line 297:
  
 * The Court held that the use was not fair use, as ageing the character and placing him in new settings was not particularly transformative,​ particularly as the character’s personality was largely unchanged. * The Court held that the use was not fair use, as ageing the character and placing him in new settings was not particularly transformative,​ particularly as the character’s personality was largely unchanged.
 +
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
  
  • ausip/copyrightdefences.txt
  • Last modified: 2 months ago
  • by nic